Milwaukee Radius Site Light Review:
The Milwaukee M12 Site Light Review is one of the most popular flashlight brands in the world. They are known for their high quality products and affordable prices.
Their site light is widely used by police departments around the globe. The company was founded in 1975 by John Hargrove, and it’s been run by his son David ever since.
Their website states that they have over 10 million lights sold worldwide. That number includes both flashlights and headlamps.
They sell their products through retail stores, online retailers like Amazon, and direct sales from distributors. Their product range covers all major categories including camping lighting, emergency backup lighting, search & rescue equipment, medical supplies and much more!
They have been making flashlights since 1978 when they started manufacturing them at their first factory in Texas. Since then they’ve expanded into other countries such as China, Brazil, Germany and the United States.
They’re currently based out of New Jersey but manufacture their flashlights in Mexico.
What makes their site light so popular?
Well for starters its price point. Its $59 (or less) which is pretty cheap compared to some of the other options out there.
Second, its utility. It’s extremely bright and can light up an entire football field.
If you’re searching for something in the woods at night, this will make things much easier. In fact many hunters use this as their primary flashlight when they go deer hunting at night
From a safety standpoint, it has an SOS function that can be used to signal for help in an emergency. It also has a strobe light for disorienting a potential attacker and getting away.
From an everyday use standpoint, the light has a magnet on the bottom and a hook on the top so you can easily attach it to a garage or car. The battery lasts for quite a while (uses 4 AA batteries) and replacement batteries are fairly cheap.
The only downside is the build quality of the housing can be a bit flimsy. On more than one occasion users have reported that their lights stopped working after just a few months of use.
Despite that, its popularity continues to rise and it receives a lot of positive attention on Amazon as well as in the media.
Read our full review of the Milwaukee M12 Site Light here.
Milwaukee 2144-20 Vs 2145-20:
When thinking about getting a new M18 cordless drill, you might be wondering if the 2144-20 is better than the 2145-20. Both of these drills are great but there are some differences between the two that you’ll want to keep in mind before making a purchase.
We’ll go over those differences below for you.
First up is the battery. The 2144-20 comes with the compact lithium ion 1.5Ah battery while the 2145-20 comes with the high capacity 3.0Ah battery.
The bigger battery will obviously last longer between charges but it’s also a little bit bigger and heavier. If you need the extra power then go with the 2145-20, otherwise save some money and go with the 2144-20.
Next up is motor torque. The 2145-20 has 450 in-lbs of torque compared to the 300 in-lbs of torque on the 2144-20.
The 2145-20 also has a no load speed of 0 – 1400 RPM compared to the no load speed of 0 – 1500 RPM on the 2144-20. If you need a drill that can really get the job done, go with the 2145-20.
Finally, we have the clutch settings. The 2144-20 has a 9 setting clutch while the 2145-20 has a 13 setting clutch.
This just means that the drill will be able to handle more varied tasks without straining the drill or the task. If you think you’ll need this, then go with the 2145-20.
Features Vastly Improved Ergonomics
The new M18 Fuel drill feels just right in your hands and that’s important for any kind of drill.
Sources & references used in this article:
- The necessity of acute bone grafting in diaphyseal forearm fractures: a retrospective review (RR Wright, GJ Schmeling… – Journal of orthopaedic …, 1997 – journals.lww.com)
- Ab interno sclerostomy with a high-powered argon endolaser: clinicopathologic correlation (GJ Jaffe, WF Mieler, RL Radius… – Archives of …, 1989 – jamanetwork.com)
- Density measures: A review and analysis (ER Alexander – Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 1993 – JSTOR)
- Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review (LF Cabeza, L Rincón, V Vilariño, G Pérez… – … energy reviews, 2014 – Elsevier)
- Research policy and review 27. New directions for understanding transportation and land use (G Giuliano – Environment and planning A, 1989 – journals.sagepub.com)
- A review of response surface methodology: a literature survey (WJ Hill, WG Hunter – Technometrics, 1966 – amstat.tandfonline.com)